Vessel position reports via ISS
2010-09-03
Below are successful digipeats via ISS from Redwood City, CA, USA.
It appears to be feasible to submit position reports via ISS, and it should be easier while at sea outside a coastal environment, where there is practically no competition for the digipeater while the radio footprint isn't over land.
I will attempt an experiment on Monday, Sept. 6th while taking a day cruise from Santa Cruz, CA, USA, using coastal (144.390 MHz) stations between ISS passes.
2010-09-02 07:51:06 UTC: N8QH-3>SW3PPY,RS0ISS-4*,qAR,N6VUD-2:'2)Al <0x1c>Y/]Maritime callsign WDF2783, MMSI 367431840=
2010-09-02 07:52:18 UTC: N8QH-3>SW3PPY,RS0ISS-4*,qAR,N8QH-10:'2)Al <0x1c>Y/]Maritime callsign WDF2783, MMSI 367431840=
2010-09-02 07:53:07 UTC: N8QH-3>SW3PPY,RS0ISS-4*,qAR,W6MSU-7:'2)Al <0x1c>Y/]Maritime callsign WDF2783, MMSI 367431840=
----------
Update: 2010-09-15
The experiment successfully sent position reports via ISS. ISS was 799 miles away at the closest point of passage, at an elevation above the horizon of only 23.6 degrees. I was able to send two packets within that 5 minute window. The position reports were sent from a sailing vessel afloat in the San Francisco (California) Bay.
(YYYYMMDDHHMMSS UTC : APRS SSID, Equip Type, ISS Callsign, "q" code, Terrestrial SatGate Callsign, Symbol, Lat, Lon, course/speed)
20100916012932 : N8QH-8]APT3A2, RS0ISS-4* ,qAR,N6VUD- 2:!3731.68N/ 12211.83WY219/ 005
20100916012802 : N8QH-8]APT3A2, RS0ISS-4* ,qAR,N6VUD- 2:!3731.80N/ 12211.71WY205/ 006
The reports were transmitted using a 10 watt MT-AIO transmitter and a simple 1/4 wave non-directional antenna. The transmitter was attached with a velcro strap to the stern pulpit railing, which functioned as an antenna counterpoise.
The experiment demonstrates the feasibility of submitting real-time vessel position reports on a VHF band beyond the usual line-of-sight VHF limitations (from anywhere on Earth), while using a simple, self-contained, and inexpensive portable transmitter. This is a capability that is otherwise beyond the reach of most sailors aboard small and rented vessels.
The only other VHF alternative is AIS. However, AIS wasn't designed to accommodate reception from space. Experiments are underway to receive AIS data from space, but the implementation is very problematic due to frequency congestion (contentioning) that occurs when the receiver is elevated above the surface by even a few thousand feet. From hundreds of miles above the surface, the challenge is practically insurmountable. Too many AIS stations are transmitting simultaneously within the satellite's reception footprint. This problem can be overcome in APRS with the addition of very simple and inexpensive technology.
In the meantime, sailors should be able to transmit multiple position reports per day since so few stations are transmitting during ISS transits over large bodies of water -- the frequency is practically unoccupied at exactly the times that cruising sailors would use it for position reports. Provided at least one terrestrial SatGate is within the footprint, the position reports will be posted on the Internet.
73
N8QH
Global Maritime Distress and Safety System Operator/Maintainer
So for distress use this is a
So for distress use, this is a BAD idea. The APRS digipeater on the ISS his been turned off for the last 3 days and is not expected to be back on until early January. You might be dead if you relied on this system.
AIS system
AIS system is operational ALSO from ISS station.
see: http://www.coaa.co.uk/shipplotter.htm
Aki
AIS
The AIS receive experiment on the ISS is a store and forward system to explore the feasibility of placing AIS satellites in orbit to expand the ground station receivers. It is not part of the amateur radio system on the ISS.
better options
Not sure I would be planning a distress signal on a digipeater that is only in range for 10 minutes a couple times a day. I'm sure I could find a lot of other alternate methods to get a distress signal out during the other 23 hours.
INTERFERENCE
Currently 11:19 AM Sunday. The next pass that is in range of his vessel is 20:40. There is not a 100% sure thing that the ISS will be using APRS on that frequency. It might be slow scan TV.
YET here I sit listening to Mr. Maritime distress spouting his beacon every 30 seconds while he is in port.
N8QH-8/ARISS>APT3A2>UI,?,F0:
!3735.37N/12218.95WY216/000
N8QH-8/ARISS>APT3A2>UI,?,F0:
>WDF2783 MMSI 367431840
We put up APRS terra based digipeaters for him to use yet here he is tying up a SATELLITE Frequency.
If the ISS decided to send SSTV, his signal will interfere with the ISS and everyone locally trying to receive it.
It should never be turned on when in range of a terra based APRS digipeater.
Please change APRS to 144.39 like the rest.
This is my second complaint about this signal on 145.825.
Response: interference
Amateur Radio is intended for EXPERIMENTATION. We all must tolerate some mutual interference from licensed and legitimate use of the frequencies. There are some Hams who try to carry out legitimate scientific research, and we quietly tolerate interference from hobbyists. Hobbyists are equally entitled to use the spectrum. This is not a commercial service that we all pay for. Everyone owns the spectrum. It's public property.
Re: Interference
ISS SSTV is normally transmitted on 145.80 (not 145.825). A beacon on 145.825 will not interfere with ISS SSTV operations.
Personally, I think automatic beacons should not be used on the satellites. Attended operations only would minimize interference and reduce the congestion.
MT-AIO ISS Path Setting
Hi there,
Great read and thanks for sharing.
Could you please confirm the path settings that you used on the MT-AIO? I'm guessing it was just ARISS?
Did the MT-AIO accept this easily in the profile? Only reason I ask is that the 'Big Red Bee' AIO would not accept ARISS in the path...
I would like to purchase a MT-AIO especially for a similar purpose but would like to make sure there won't be any issues with programming of the path before I spend my money...
Cheers, Duncan - VK6GHZ