Archive - Jun 24, 2009
ISS Radio Report
Date/Time:
9 years 26 weeks ago
Mode:
PACKET
Status:
NOT ACTIVE
Uplink:
VHF
Downlink:
VHF (other) Description:
18:05 UTC Nothing heard over Puebla, Mexico grid: EK09vb
XE1SDK-1 – Wed, 2009 – 06 – 24 18:09
ISS Radio Report
Date/Time:
9 years 26 weeks ago
Mode:
PACKET
Status:
NOT ACTIVE
Uplink:
VHF
Downlink:
VHF (other) Description:
Nothing heard over Puebla, Mexico 16:30 UTC EK09vb
XE1SDK-1 – Wed, 2009 – 06 – 24 16:36
ISS Radio Report
Date/Time:
9 years 26 weeks ago
Mode:
PACKET
Status:
NOT ACTIVE
Uplink:
VHF
Downlink:
VHF (other) Description:
Nothing heard over Cincinnati at 9:15 am ESDT pass.
WB8NUT – Wed, 2009 – 06 – 24 13:26
ISS Radio Report
Date/Time:
9 years 26 weeks ago
Mode:
VOICE
Status:
NOT ACTIVE
Uplink:
VHF
Downlink:
VHF (other) Description:
no packet on 145.800 or .825
kb2m – Wed, 2009 – 06 – 24 11:46
ISS Radio Report
Date/Time:
9 years 26 weeks ago
Mode:
PACKET
Status:
NOT ACTIVE
Uplink:
VHF
Downlink:
VHF (other) Description:
No signal. Saludos desde Monterrey, México.
XE2MZS – Wed, 2009 – 06 – 24 08:26
is 145.800 an IARU "illegal" frequency?
When voice downlink is set for 145.800, theoretically falls within the IARU border for amateur space communications. But since the IARU bandplan has right underneath the amateur space band on 145,800-146,000 the Region 1 Repeater 12.5 KHz slots (R0 - R7B) with the latter falling on 145,787.5, when ISS sets and doppler draws the transmission frequency maximum 12 KHz down, (due to enormous relative to observers speeds ISS excibits, a result of a lower than average spacecrafts orbit)
mutual interference with the repeaters is assured.
Let me ask for a downlink frequency change, then. Maybe the packet frequency at 145.825 is best suited for voice downlinks, too.
sw9ofo – Wed, 2009 – 06 – 24 05:50